תגית: Cloud Computing

Microsoft's Cloud Platform System (CPS) vs. the World (VMware EVO:Rails and Amazon)

More bigs news from Microsoft – Microsoft's Cloud Platform System (CPS) –  (I call it Azure Cloud "Private Edition") –  a joint announcement from Microsoft and Dell, which offers a bundle including Dell Racks with expandble computing, storage and networking, running a private Azure cloud (on premise) that should look and work the same as Microsoft's public Azure offering.

You can create multiple tenants to represent different groups, organizations or sub-companies and lauch Windows and Linux instances. You can expand the hardware to support hundreds or thousands of VMs.

In continuation for its future Docker based Windows containers support for Windows Server and Azure, it looks like Microsoft is on a roll. This time, looks like its Cloud Platform System offering goes head to head with VMware's EVO:Rail offering, announced just few weeks ago in the VMware World 2014 conference. This is also an in-direct competition with Amazon's offerings, which could have a hit-run with customers massively using Microsoft's technologies.

This might also be a nice fresh innovative-direction for Dell, and certainly shows it is working hard to create new interesting offertings, which makes you wonder, what else is coming next.

Now its time to look deeper into the new system, maybe try and download the Windows Azure Pack and see how it can be used on your current hardware

What do you think?

Cloud Computing and SAAS Secrets revealed – 7 Consumption Economics Rules

This is important to get, for any enterprise software producer – here is a summary of more than an hour of video nuggets going through the must-read "Consumption Economics: The New Rules of Tech" Book, by J.B. Wood, Todd Hewlin and Thomas Lah.

Your customers are approaching a consumption gap: due to shrinking revenue and resources they can't deploy your complex product fast enough to create the business value that justified paying for your costly products in the past, No matter how many powerful new features you offer. This makes the market ripe for price wars and disruption.

Customers cannot afford the long traditional time, required to deploy enterprise IT products.
Employees simply go directly to the SAAS based providers, ignoring any uneasy traditional solution.

There is lots of money to be made in SAAS – 200 million USD a year, but some will be extracted from existing solutions…

How should you, the solution provider move to the new paradigm without hurting your margins too fast?

The 7 new rules for Enterprise IT Software providers:

1. Risk is shifting from the customer to the service provider and from few lot of CAPEX to many small OPEX transactions. In the past the customer paid for IT solutions up front and owned the deployment risk, now it is the other way around.

2. Simplicity is KING. People prefer simpler partial good enough solutions, over full range complex solutions, the latter are expensive in both price and effort to deploy. The result is price war downhill in which non SAAS suppliers can't win.

3. Users can finally drive tech decisions, because those services exist without mass dependency on corporate IT, and users will prefer SAAS.

4. Customer aggregators shrink direct market. Rack Space, Amazon and others will aim to aggregate users who need your SAAS solutions…so you as the solution creator have less direct sales opportunities to customers…and the aggregators will force you to bring your price down, to match their pricing…this means you could be commoditized…

5. Channel value reset. Global system integration services such as IBM and Infosys could get a lot of value by aggregating customers, providing complete line of business solutions, assisting in blurring the lines across private and public cloud. Smaller VARs and OEMs are in danger and will need to reshape their workforce and services to live with smaller chunks of income and bring value by launching consumption based services, enabling business process change and shifting from resell to fee for service.

6. Tech pricing under pressure. You need a freemium / try for free model. You need to be able and sell at a very low price ($5 per user…) and the have upgrade option up to the highest level ($250 per user) instead of getting paid a huge total amount up-front.
Customers will want to move from the rigid CAPEX fixed price model, via OPEX subscription model, which does not reflect actual use of the service, yet is cheaper than CAPEX, and finally land onto the consumption based subscription, where users only pay for what they use or maybe for the outcome they get, over short periods of time. The latter will require both vendors and customers to adjust their monetary systems.

7. Behavioral data drives consumption: where you the supplier use data gathered on what your customers want as they use your service, to adjust and give more, leading to further revenue. Most SAAS providers focus only on acquiring customers and monetizing them, while neglecting engagement (where the service automatically offers the user with new ways of using the service) and viral expansion of the use of the service as well as the customer base.

You want to move from being a master of complexity to master of consumption, and widen your market reach.

We can see 3 main points here:

1. Customers will pay per use.
2. You have to focus on the end users, since those who are more successful as a result of using your services, will consume more, and hence pay you more.
3. The risk for value generation by using our services moves from your users to you, the provider.

The old definition of 'deployment done' meant the sale was made and initial setup of our software has been completed, setting our customer to pay us maintenance fee.
The SAAS definition of 'deployment done' should mean that the customer is massively using our service, benefiting of the complete suite of options.
This means you have to become your customer's companion, guide and assistant in a successful journey of their business, using our SAAS offering.

Everything in the software industry needs to morph to support consumption, that's based use of the software.
Marketing for example should allow automatic, real time, amazon like offering of additional services, that match what the user or other users like him seem to need.

Services though, will probably have the most fundamental affect. If we use statistics that assume the software business is worth 200 billion dollars, then the services business is 4 times bigger!
The services business addresses implementation, integration and maintenance. For many software vendors this sums up to 50% of their income! Moving to SAAS actually takes care of the management of complexity that software vendors have within their products. That's exactly what Cloud Computing and SAAS inherently resolves, because there is no effort over installation and integration, while software updates are expected to be delivered as part of the subscription model. The right way to defend the services golden egg is by transiting from complexity management to creation of real business value. So instead of advising on how to get our software going, you need to advise and assist our customers to get business value through the use of our products. We need to look into what our most successful customers are doing every day, with our software and assist others does that as well.
So we should get out of the mental focus on margins, cost centers and such, and become masters in value creation for our customers. This requires us to break down the inter-services barriers and silos (consulting, support, education and others).
During this process will need to change our own organizational structure and allow sharing of resources, information and knowledge. The most valuable skillets will revolve around consulting for business value creation, through the use of our products, from technical wizardry to business processes mastery. We could then package this together into managed services offerings.
We'll need expertise in areas such as vertical industry, business, design, product, technical, consumption.
The real driver for consumption and sales will be the services organization rather than sales or marketing, as they will be the ones providing consultancy, aimed to increase customer's business value through increased consumption of their SAAS offering, which is gained by providing customers with education, support, professional services, etc.

Cloud computing affects will not revolve around hosting, on premise or off premise; it will rather be mandated by the consumption of services.

You don't want to import the current structure of your legacy software into the new model. You have to transform every aspect of your business, including people, processes, and technology as well as belief systems.

Like Apple, you need to do both innovation in the relevant areas, and also to serve your customers so they are successful.

To facilitate this transition you can't force it into people's mind, but you need to keep asking the right questions…

Time To Innovate (TTI): Amazon Cloud Access Control and Bromium vSentry

Listen to this post Listen to this post here:   Yesterday Amazon announced it is starting to provide AWS role based resource access control. This follows the previous announcements regarding other AWS services, being integrated into Amazon's IAM framework:

AWS Elastic Beanstalk Supports IAM Roles

AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) Adds Support for Variables in Access Control Policies

We can say one thing for sure about Amazon: Amazon is going through a constant continuous improvement cycle, complementing its cloud service portfolio. This surely is attractive for IT professionals looking for a restless innovative solution provider, understanding that in many cases, the active improvement process is much more important than the "static perfectness" state others try to reach.

On the other edge of the spectrum, take a look at the vSentry end-user threat protection solution from Bromium, and what's interesting to me are their 2 core innovations:

Micro-Virtualization creating a transparent shield for any un-trusted application, which allows the user feel safe, and avoid irrelevant alerts, as the un-trusted application they use, can try and do harm, to find itself isolated, without any actual modification of user data. All the affects of the malware are cleaned up, as its virtual sandbox vanishes as soon as the application exits. That's based on the Intel VT technology.

This also enables the second innovation – Task Introspection. Since applications can do anything they want, be it as malicious as they can, as they are getting virtual rather than actual access to the system's resources, an attack can be recorded and reviewed, at will, saving forensics time and effort.

In this case as well, what's important to note, is the rapid exploitation of the opportunity to innovate, using current tools (such as Intel VT). Sure, this solution is not perfect, and will be circumvented at some point, but it does offer a pain-killer type of remedy, which IT professionals are likely to quickly grab.

I believe there should be a new term for us to useTime To Innovate (TTI) – which is about measuring how much time it takes you to innovate, as soon as an opportunity is presented.

Are you rapidly innovating as well, or endlessly trying to perfect your solution?

Amazon Cloud Drive is out in the wild (Details and Risks)

Amazon has finally released its Dropbox / Google Drive / SkyDrive "killer"

Listen to this postClick here to listen to this post: 

It lets you save files to Amazon storage systems right on your Windows or Mac desktop, through a local folder that gets synced automatically.

Few notes:

  1. The first 5GB of storage are free, and then you start paying.
  2. It is separate from the usual Amazon S3 storage.
  3. No sharing through links exists yet, but I expect it will be added in the future
  4. Check the terms and conditions of use…looks like they allow Amazon disclose what you put there rather easily…

Another question that becomes prevalent is "How should we address the variety of cloud storage systems running all on our desktops?"

  1. Stick to just one? (That's my choice for now…)
  2. Split across several?
  3. Use Apps that consolidate all Cloud Drives into a single unit and get into the same risks which RAID 0 has (one disk is gone, and our data is a mess…)

All this tightly coupled web accessible, cloud based, desktop integrated content highlights a relevant security risk factor: Attacks which could penetrate through one end (say through web URL exploitation tactics) and end up much easier in the other side (desktop or other user's desktops).

Amazon Cloud Drive is a 61.8MB download (!) and you can get it right here:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/feature.html?ie=UTF8&docId=1000796931

Will you use Amazon Cloud Drive? How?

Cinderella cloud edition…

How the big data project was started by yahoo, selected by Facebook, as its long term database platform, and became the powerful engine of the leading data warehouse supplier greenplum (EMC):

http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2013/02/pivotal-hd-greenplum-emc/

I did mention greenplum in my big data appliance review Webinar posted here:

Yet another cloud provider spill over (Azure) and the Missing Cloud Sync Feature


This Friday February 22 at 12:44 PM PST, Microsoft reported a worldwide outage impacting HTTPS traffic due to an expired SSL certificate. They added "Customers may experience intermittent failures during this period. We apologize for any inconvenience this causes our customers."

This is yet another collapse of a major cloud provider, IT Professionals and businesses are becoming dependent on.

While each cloud provider has its own high availability solutions, and dedicated staff to assist resolve issues, as quickly as possible, it is becoming more aparent, that major downtime is bound to happen to all of them.

Yet, it seems everyone is ignoring the "pink elephant" roaming across our delicate glass data center.

If massive cloud provider downtime is bound to happen – what is the killer app?

I'd say its the one that continously syncs your data and apps across more than one cloud provider, so you can switch from one cloud provider to the other, based on their availability.

Call it ADN (CDN = Content Delivery Network, and ADN would be Application Delivery Network).

Do you agree?

Who should be the provider of ADN then?